Re: SCM_ASSERT_TYPE

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi,

Andy Wingo <address@hidden> skribis:

> On Sat 08 Oct 2011 18:04, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>>> And what about the seldom-used SCM_ASRTGO?
>>
>> Likewise (Google Codesearch finds a couple of external users.)
>
> Uf, I replied before I saw your message.  It is gone in master.  Do you
> think we need to re-add it?

Probably, as it doesn’t cost much and saves us a lengthy flame war.  ;-)

> Codesearch found one project that used it.  I suggest reverting the
> addition to the manual.

You mean it should be left undocumented?

I think ideally everything should be either documented or deprecated
(with a documented replacement).

Thanks,
Ludo’.