[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?
From: |
Noah Lavine |
Subject: |
Re: Guile: What's wrong with this? |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Jan 2012 22:12:54 -0500 |
Hello,
> Then it turned out that the string functions would now clear the
> high order bit on strings, so they are no longer byte arrays and
> there is no replacement but to roll my own. I stopped supporting
> byte arrays. A noticable nuisance.
This is just a side note to the main discussion, but there is now a
'bytevector' datatype you can use. Does that work for you? If not,
what functionality is missing?
Thanks,
Noah
- What's wrong with this?, Bruce Korb, 2012/01/02
- Re: What's wrong with this?, Mike Gran, 2012/01/03
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Bruce Korb, 2012/01/03
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Mike Gran, 2012/01/03
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/01/03
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Bruce Korb, 2012/01/03
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/01/03
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Bruce Korb, 2012/01/03
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?,
Noah Lavine <=
- Re: bytevector -- was: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Bruce Korb, 2012/01/04
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/01/04
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Bruce Korb, 2012/01/04
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/01/04
- Re: non-reproduction of initial issue -- was: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Bruce Korb, 2012/01/05
- Re: non-reproduction of initial issue -- was: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Mark H Weaver, 2012/01/05
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Ian Price, 2012/01/04
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Bruce Korb, 2012/01/04
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, Andy Wingo, 2012/01/04
- Re: Guile: What's wrong with this?, David Kastrup, 2012/01/04