[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU Guile branch, master, updated. v2.1.0-102-g0f9f51a
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: GNU Guile branch, master, updated. v2.1.0-102-g0f9f51a |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:58:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
On Fri 11 Nov 2011 21:20, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:
>>> On Thu 10 Nov 2011 05:36, Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> writes:
>>>> What method do you use to uniquify a macro-introduced top-level name,
>>>> such that a recompile yields the same name? I have doubts that this is
>>>> possible without breaking hygiene in some cases.
>>>
>>> See http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.reports/896/focus=1009.
>>
>> Thanks for the pointer. For posterity, here's the relevant post:
>
> Thanks for digging it out. Would be nice to see such Guile development
> discussions on guile-devel, too.
Indeed, though to be fair that was a thread that was months old, in
response to others' comments on the spec, and initially directed to
other implementors, after the threads we had here.
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
- Re: GNU Guile branch, master, updated. v2.1.0-102-g0f9f51a, Mark H Weaver, 2011/11/09
- Re: GNU Guile branch, master, updated. v2.1.0-102-g0f9f51a, Andy Wingo, 2011/11/10
- Re: GNU Guile branch, master, updated. v2.1.0-102-g0f9f51a, Mark H Weaver, 2011/11/10
- Re: GNU Guile branch, master, updated. v2.1.0-102-g0f9f51a, Andy Wingo, 2011/11/15
- Re: GNU Guile branch, master, updated. v2.1.0-102-g0f9f51a, Mark H Weaver, 2011/11/15