Re: Defining Functions With Syntax

[Noah Lavine]

>> For instance, what about doing
>>
>>   (compile (peg-sexp-compile <some-s-expression>) #:from scheme-syntax
>> #:to value)
>>
>> ? That seems like a nice API to me.
>
> You could do the same with #:from 'scheme, no?

I don't think so, because I think #:from 'scheme expects an
S-expression, but peg-sexp-compile returns a syntax object. I might be
wrong, though.

Noah