[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guildhall status
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: guildhall status |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:05:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110017 (No Gnus v0.17) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi!
Andy Wingo <address@hidden> skribis:
> On Mon 18 Jul 2011 15:06, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>>> I will see if I can get work to sponsor a server that we can use, and
>>> see if we can get it aliased to guildhall.gnu.org -- unless someone else
>>> would like to provide the server. It would be nice to have root on that
>>> server, FWIW. It could be a VM.
>>
>> I believe FSF could lend us a server or VM, which would thus be
>> “independent”, but we’d need to check.
>
> Yeah that would be nice. I have not had much luck with FSF folk in the
> past though.
How about giving them a chance, and switching to Igalia if we don’t get
positive feedback in a timely fashion?
I believe address@hidden is the place to ask for such things; copying
gnu-advisory@ may help. Would you like to try? :-)
>> Since the project may become quite central, it would be nice if it could
>> be FSF-copyrighted. That’s obviously something to discuss with Andreas,
>> but the sooner the better.
>
> If it would become part of Guile I would agree with you. If it stays
> separate then it is less clear. Copyright assignment is actually not a
> precondition to be GNU, AFAIK, and all other things being equal, I would
> prefer it if we all kept our copyrights and kept the code as GPLv3+.
Yes, assignment is optional, but it’s a plus for “strategical” projects.
In this case, both approaches would be OK I suppose.
Thanks,
Ludo’.