[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: binary-port?
|
From: |
Andy Wingo |
|
Subject: |
Re: binary-port? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:20:55 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
On Mon 25 Apr 2011 16:08, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> I wouldn’t want the “native” port type to be disjoint from the R6RS port
> types, notably because there’s no “native” equivalent to the R6RS binary
> I/O API, and also because it would hamper composition of R6RS and
> non-R6RS code.
There is (ice-9 binary-ports). Of course that doesn't much help the
composition argument.
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
- binary-port?, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/04/22
- Re: binary-port?, Andreas Rottmann, 2011/04/22
- Re: binary-port?, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/04/23
- Re: binary-port?, Andreas Rottmann, 2011/04/25
- Re: binary-port?, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/04/25
- Re: binary-port?,
Andy Wingo <=
- Re: binary-port?, Andreas Rottmann, 2011/04/25
- Re: binary-port?, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/04/26