Re: Just to mention: Why there's still not any guile-2.0 packages in linux distributions?

[Noah Lavine]

I don't know about the packaging, but I think the .go files depend on
the endianness of the machine but nothing else. So you should be able
to move them between different little-endian or big-endian machines
(unless I'm wrong). But it seems much safer to me to just compile
things. You shouldn't have to do it more than once unless you develop
Guile.

Good luck,
Noah

On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:15 PM, CRLF0710 <address@hidden> wrote:
> Guile 2.0 has been there for some time. Why there's still not any
> guile-2.0 package in linux distributions?
> Did they have trouble packaging it?
>
> By the way, is the .go file portable? Building them(rnrs, ice-9 etc)
> during compiling guile takes so looooong...
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> CrLF.0710
>
>