[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PEG Patches
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: PEG Patches |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:20:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
On Tue 29 Mar 2011 14:47, Noah Lavine <address@hidden> writes:
>> (define-peg-matcher and cg-and)
>
> That's doable. But if we're going to choose what to do entirely based
> on the first element of the list, then we could also just not define
> peg-sexp-compile at all and make each of the code generation functions
> into macros.
>
> How does that sound?
Good idea. Sounds great to me!
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
- PEG Patches, Noah Lavine, 2011/03/06
- Re: PEG Patches, Noah Lavine, 2011/03/06
- Re: PEG Patches, Andy Wingo, 2011/03/25
- Re: PEG Patches, Noah Lavine, 2011/03/28
- Re: PEG Patches, Noah Lavine, 2011/03/28
- Re: PEG Patches, Michael Lucy, 2011/03/28
- Re: PEG Patches, Andy Wingo, 2011/03/29
- Re: PEG Patches, Noah Lavine, 2011/03/29
- Re: PEG Patches,
Andy Wingo <=
- Re: PEG Patches, Noah Lavine, 2011/03/31