[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fmt Module
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Fmt Module |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Mar 2011 16:01:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110013 (No Gnus v0.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hello,
Andreas Rottmann <address@hidden> writes:
> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
[...]
>> Besides it’s still unclear (to me) what the future of Wak and similar
>> projects is. I hope that it will take off, but I haven’t forgotten
>> Snow, ScmPkg, etc. either.
>>
> Well, there's a (IMHO) important difference in that Wak packages are
> based on R6RS, which specifies a module system.
But it doesn’t specify how modules are mapped to files.
And there’s R7RS, which specifies and slightly incompatible module
system, and there’s people who’ll always want to use their
implementation’s native module system, etc.
Let’s hope I’m overly pessimistic. :-)
Thanks,
Ludo’.
- Fmt Module, Noah Lavine, 2011/03/12
- Re: Fmt Module, Andreas Rottmann, 2011/03/13
- Re: Fmt Module, Noah Lavine, 2011/03/13
- Re: Fmt Module, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/03/14
- Re: Fmt Module, Andreas Rottmann, 2011/03/23
- Re: Fmt Module, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/03/24
- Re: Fmt Module, Andreas Rottmann, 2011/03/26
- Re: Fmt Module,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Fmt Module, Andy Wingo, 2011/03/27
- Re: Fmt Module, Noah Lavine, 2011/03/27
- Re: Fmt Module, Andreas Rottmann, 2011/03/27