[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: summer of code ideas
From: |
Mike Gran |
Subject: |
Re: summer of code ideas |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Mar 2011 17:45:35 -0800 (PST) |
From: Mark H Weaver <address@hidden>
>To: Jose A. Ortega Ruiz <address@hidden>
>Cc: address@hidden
>Sent: Monday, March 7, 2011 5:10 PM
>Subject: Re: summer of code ideas
>
>>"Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" <address@hidden> writes:
>>> (use-modules (url://a-url.com library module #:optional a-rev-number))
>>
>> FWIW, i think this is a bad idea. It intermingles two concerns that are
>> othogonal, namely installing a package and using it.
>
>I very strongly agree with jao. Systems like this, e.g. Python Eggs,
>have been a major headache for distributions to deal with. Debian
>actually takes the time to disable this automatic downloading and
>installing functionality from their Python packages, and I'm glad for
>it. I am very security conscious, and the thought of software being
>automatically installed "on-demand" from untrusted sources when I run a
>program, or maybe even when I first use some particular functionality of
>that program, is very disconcerting.
I think people are conflating 'an idea' with 'the idea' here. The call was
for possible SOC ideas.
At my work, we sometimes operate this way: field engineers use client
programs that are rather like AJAX webapps. The head office updates a
server. It works for us.
I didn't suggest that for all time Guile must officially such a system.
Sheesh.
-Mike
- Re: summer of code ideas, (continued)