Re: hygiene and macro-introduced toplevel bindings

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi,

Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:

> But you have to, I think.  If that module that contained the above
> define-syntactic-accessor expansion exports "foo", then in another
> module you have:
>
>   (define bar (lambda () (foo)))
>
> which expands to
>
>   (define bar (lambda () val-234123))
>
> Val needs to be named.

FWIW I had this problem back when ‘define-wrapped-pointer-type’
generated the SRFI-9 record name (recall that SRFI-9 accessors,
constructors, and type predicates are macros, which refer to the global
variable that holds the vtable.)

The solution I chose was to let users provided the record name, like
‘define-record-type’ does (de6fb1875d1a7e8d2a39ec8eba753c07abcd4263).

Thanks,
Ludo’.