Re: 2.0.x branched!

[Andy Wingo]

On Fri 18 Feb 2011 21:37, Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:

> Now that 2.0.0 is out, I presume the general procedure from now on
> should be:
>
> - committing safe 2.0.x stuff (in particular, as far as I'm concerned,
>   docs) to the stable-2.0 branch
>
> - committing anything else to master
>
> - periodically merging from stable-2.0 to master.
>
> Is that right?

That sounds about right to me, though I am quite ignorant in this
regard.  Compatible changes on 2.0.x seem fine to me; we should live in
2.0.x for a year or two I think.

Tough to plan for the future, though!

Cheers,

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/