[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug in Guile's Posix Networking
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: Bug in Guile's Posix Networking |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Feb 2011 23:00:05 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Noah,
On Sat 12 Feb 2011 22:35, Noah Lavine <address@hidden> writes:
> socket(0x2, 0x1, 0x0) = 73 0 ; make a socket -
> INET family, SOCK_STREAM, internet protocol; we got one with
> descriptor 73
> fcntl(0x49, 0x3, 0x0) = 2 0 ; get flags for
> file descriptor 49. result 2 probably means it is read and writable.
> lseek(0x49, 0x0, 0x1) = -1 Err#29 ; errno 29 is "illegal
> seek"
> setsockopt(0x49, 0xFFFF, 0x4) = 0 0 ; setsockopt on descriptor
> 49
> bind(0x49, 0x100709EE0, 0x10) = -1 Err#49 ; bind descriptor 49.
> errno 49 is "protocol driver not attached"
>
> ;; And now there's already been an error, and we'll backtrace it.
> write(0x2, "Backtrace:\n\0", 0xB) = 11 0
> ...
>
> It seems to me that the strangest issue is that socket() return file
> descriptor 73, but the script then did system calls on file descriptor
> 49. Does anyone know a reason that would happen?
#x49 is 73 :)
Could the lseek could be the problem?
A
--
http://wingolog.org/
- Bug in Guile's Posix Networking, Noah Lavine, 2011/02/07
- Re: Bug in Guile's Posix Networking, Andreas Rottmann, 2011/02/07
- Re: Bug in Guile's Posix Networking, Noah Lavine, 2011/02/12
- Re: Bug in Guile's Posix Networking, Andy Wingo, 2011/02/12
- Re: Bug in Guile's Posix Networking, Noah Lavine, 2011/02/12
- Re: Bug in Guile's Posix Networking,
Andy Wingo <=
- Re: Bug in Guile's Posix Networking, Noah Lavine, 2011/02/12
- Re: Bug in Guile's Posix Networking, Noah Lavine, 2011/02/12
- Re: Bug in Guile's Posix Networking, Noah Lavine, 2011/02/12
- Re: Bug in Guile's Posix Networking, Noah Lavine, 2011/02/12
- Re: Bug in Guile's Posix Networking, Ken Raeburn, 2011/02/13
- Re: Bug in Guile's Posix Networking, Noah Lavine, 2011/02/13
- Re: Bug in Guile's Posix Networking, Noah Lavine, 2011/02/13
- Re: Bug in Guile's Posix Networking, Ken Raeburn, 2011/02/13
- Re: Bug in Guile's Posix Networking, Andy Wingo, 2011/02/13
- Re: Bug in Guile's Posix Networking, Noah Lavine, 2011/02/13