Re: implicitly using existing function as generic fails in 1.9

[Jan Nieuwenhuizen]

Andy Wingo schreef op vr 11-02-2011 om 18:48 [+0100]:
> On Wed 02 Feb 2011 15:02, Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> >     WARNING: (use): `remove!' imported from both (remove) and (srfi srfi-1)
> 
> As far as I can tell, it never worked to merge generics between a
> regular procedure and a generic.

> And indeed that does not appear to work with 1.8.

I'm attaching the individual files; this works with 1.8.7:

    19:52:20 address@hidden:~/vc/schikkers-list/remove
    $ ./run.scm 
    WARNING: (use): `remove!' imported from both (srfi srfi-1) and (remove)
    <class>: remove!
    19:52:24 address@hidden:~/vc/schikkers-list/remove

> I don't understand what's going on here, really.  Do you?

No, and if you say it's not supported, I'll just have to
choose other names for those functions.

Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar®  http://AvatarAcademy.nl

use.scm
Description: Text Data

run.scm
Description: Text Data

remove.scm
Description: Text Data