Re: Relocatable installation

[Andy Wingo]

On Mon 31 Jan 2011 21:55, Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> writes:

>> What about the extensions paths?  Are all paths from libpath.h
>> relocatable?
>
> Good question, we [LilyPond installs] never needed/used those,
> I guess.  I can imagine that more paths need to be added, this
> was sufficient for guile-1.8, however.

May I suggest then a bit more rigor in the choice of paths.  What paths
does Guile use?  Are they entirely taken from argv0, or are they
hard-coded at build time?  I'm not opposed to relocatable builds, in
principle, but if you can move Guile around, then it needs to hard-code
no paths in it.

Regards,

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/