[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: When to use SCM_DEFINE vs SCM_GPROC vs SCM_PRIMITIVE_GENERIC?
From: |
Mark H Weaver |
Subject: |
Re: When to use SCM_DEFINE vs SCM_GPROC vs SCM_PRIMITIVE_GENERIC? |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Jan 2011 10:39:47 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:
> And I don't recall the practical difference between GPROC and
> PRIMITIVE_GENERIC.
I found the answer. According to a commit message by Mikael Djurfeldt
in 2003, all uses of SCM_GPROC should be converted to use
SCM_PRIMITIVE_GENERIC.
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.cvs/month=20030301
I will do this for all extensible functions in numbers.c. I will also
make some other numeric functions extensible. For example, it occurs to
me if we make `inf?', `nan?', and `finite?' extensible, then users will
be able to easily extend them to handle non-real complex values, if
desired.
Best,
Mark