[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: two oh, two oh, two oh
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: two oh, two oh, two oh |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:20:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi!
Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:
> On Thu 27 Jan 2011 20:58, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> We should create ‘branch_release-2-0’ once 1.9.15 is out.
>
> Can we use some more sensible name? "stable-2.0" or something?
I dislike the current convention but changing it could lead to confusion
and will break scripts, such as the sed script passed to
‘git-version-gen’ in ‘configure.ac’.
OTOH, this script can be adjusted as we see fit, and the branch naming
scheme can be documented on the web page.
So if there’s no objection, then OK for ‘stable-2.0’.
Thanks,
Ludo’.