Re: source-location->source-properties

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi!

Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:

> On Thu 18 Nov 2010 22:37, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

[...]

>> "Andy Wingo" <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> +            source-location->source-properties
>>
>> I was thinking that this procedure could be made internal to the ES
>> compiler, so that the export list of (system base lalr) remains
>> identical to that upstream.
>
> Well, we could. It just seemed like something other compiler writers
> might want, so I put it here.

I’d keep it private to the ES compiler until it’s actually needed
elsewhere.  No big deal, though.

> Is it important that we have exactly the same set of exports as
> upstream, or is a compatible set sufficient?

I’d rather export the same bindings as upstream.  This should make life
easier to people using the same module in other schemes, for instance.

Thanks,
Ludo’.