Re: [PATCH] Add implementation of SRFI 27

[Ludovic Courtès]

Howdy!

Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:

> In the particular case of srfis, I would think that one could rig up an
> htmlprag -> stexi translator, and thus get most of the way ;-) You could
> start with the code in guile-gnome in (gnome gw support gtk-doc).

I think raw SRFIs wouldn’t fit well in the user manual, but yes, such a
tool could help get started.

>> Still, some sort of a transcription would be nice (though for SRFI-42,
>> for example, the second part of the abstract and the rationale don’t
>> belong in Guile’s manual), but having the code is nice too, so...
>
> Yes, having code is good. But really, we need code *and*
> documentation. It should only take a couple hours or so, and it's really
> appreciated.

Yeah, agreed.

Thanks,
Ludo’.