Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hey!

Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:

> On Tue 20 Jul 2010 18:35, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> I would prefer not to enshrine a "regular / debug" split again though. I
>>> guess that's what really bothers me. It's especially egregious if you
>>> can't switch at runtime.
>>
>> The split survived!  :-)
>>
>> $ guile -c 'sdf'
>> ERROR: In procedure catch-closure:
>> ERROR: Unbound variable: sdf
>>
>> $ guile --debug -c 'sdf'
>> Backtrace:
> [...]
>
> Hehe. That, to me, is a bug ;-) What do you think about always giving
> backtraces for uncaught errors?

I’m all for it!

Ludo’.