[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:11:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Yo,
On Tue 20 Jul 2010 18:35, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I would prefer not to enshrine a "regular / debug" split again though. I
>> guess that's what really bothers me. It's especially egregious if you
>> can't switch at runtime.
>
> The split survived! :-)
>
> $ guile -c 'sdf'
> ERROR: In procedure catch-closure:
> ERROR: Unbound variable: sdf
>
> $ guile --debug -c 'sdf'
> Backtrace:
[...]
Hehe. That, to me, is a bug ;-) What do you think about always giving
backtraces for uncaught errors? This does not impact regular vs debug
VMs, as thankfully we can walk any stack now.
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
- SRFI-1 in Scheme, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/07/12
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Andy Wingo, 2010/07/13
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/07/13
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Andy Wingo, 2010/07/13
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/07/13
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Andy Wingo, 2010/07/14
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/07/15
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Andy Wingo, 2010/07/19
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/07/20
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme,
Andy Wingo <=
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/07/21
- Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme, Andy Wingo, 2010/07/20