guile-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: fmatch


From: stefan
Subject: Re: fmatch
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 23:05:08 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.31.12-0.2-desktop; KDE/4.3.5; x86_64; ; )

is this better?

/Stefan

On Monday 24 May 2010 10:08:58 pm Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> stefan <address@hidden> writes:
> > On Saturday 22 May 2010 11:03:12 pm Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> stefan <address@hidden> writes:
> >> > Shall we say that we use the slightly modified version of (ice-9
> >> > match) that ypu dug up for now!
> >>
> >> Hmm, yes?  Please send an actual patch against Guile master, so we have
> >> something concrete do discuss.  :-)
> >
> > In this mail a patch is made for discussions. It's not upstream ready
> > but intended for further discussions.
> 
> Thanks!  Your patch inserts a modified version of Shinn’s match as
> (ice-9 match).  I’d prefer to have the upstream version unmodified, say
> as ‘match.upstream.scm’, and have ‘match.scm’ just ‘include-from-path’
> that file, along with defining any necessary macros for compatibility
> (see, e.g., how ‘sxml/ssax.scm’ does that.)
> 
> Could you look into it?
> 
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
> 

Attachment: match.patch
Description: Text Data


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]