Re: guile and elisp

[Grant Rettke]

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> wrote:
> What I meant is that Scheme’s disjoint boolean type should be considered
> the Right Thing.  I’d rather keep it really disjoint, at the cost of
> weaker/less trivial interop, than going the elisp road too far.

Are you guys discussing something like a foreign function interface
for Scheme to Elisp and vice versa?

Sorry for the dense question as from what I have read it started very
technical, and I am wondering what is the overarching vision.