Re: SCM_BOOL_F == 0 and BDW-GC

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hello,

Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:

> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

[...]

>> Ugly stuff like ‘scm_fixup_weak_alist ()’ would still be needed.
>
> Thanks, I understand now.  scm_fixup_weak_alist looks OK to me.  Surely
> we must have had something like that with Guile GC too?  (Except that it
> was probably mixed up with the GC'ing code, and so was even uglier!)

Well, indeed.

>>> SCM_UNDEFINED == 0 is sounding promising...
>>
>> Yeah.  Sorry for the false hope about SCM_BOOL_F == 0.
>
> So are you going to try out SCM_UNDEFINED == 0 ?

Who, me?  :-)

I’ll add it to my to-do list and report back, then.

Thanks,
Ludo’.