Re: BDW-GC branch updated

[dsmich]

---- Andreas Rottmann <address@hidden> wrote: 
> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> > Also, there are definite benefits to using a conservative GC for
> > libguile, given how tightly it can be integrated with C (e.g., [2]).
> >
> My main concern is/was that by moving to a conservatice GC, and
> _consequently changing the API of libguile to assume a conservative GC_
> (as outlined in [2]), you get third code relying on that as well. This
> would make it effectively impossible to ever switch back to a precise GC
> without potentially breaking all third-party code using the libguile
> API.

Isn't the current gc in guile already conservative?

-Dale