[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff
From: |
Mike Gran |
Subject: |
Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:13:22 -0700 |
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 17:54 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I also noticed another problem (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu):
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> scheme@(guile-user)> (string=? "\u0100\u0101\x0102" "\u0100\u0101\x0102")
>
> Backtrace:
> In unknown file:
> ?: 0* [#<vm 7fc03c042ff0> #<program 7fc0349061c0 at <unknown port>:4:0 ()>]
> 5: 1* [#<program 7fc0349061c0 at <unknown port>:4:0 ()>]
> ?: 2* [string=? "\u0100\u0101\x0102" "\u0100\u0101\x0102"]
>
> ERROR: In procedure string=?:
> ERROR: Invalid read access of chars of wide string: "\u0100\u0101\x0102"
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> It's not a regression strictly speaking, but still. Mike? :-)
All of srfi-13.c isn't ready to operate on non-8-bit strings. string=?
calls MY_VALIDATE_SUBSTRING_SPEC_COPY, which calls scm_i_string_chars.
scm_i_string_chars either returns a pointer to the Latin-1 strings or
errors with the error you saw.
-Mike
Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff, Greg Troxel, 2009/08/11
Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff, Greg Troxel, 2009/08/11
Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff, Ken Raeburn, 2009/08/11
Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/08/11
Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff, Greg Troxel, 2009/08/11
Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/08/11
Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff, Greg Troxel, 2009/08/12
Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/08/12
Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff, Greg Troxel, 2009/08/12