Re: [PATCH] %nil-handling optimization and fixes v1

[Neil Jerram]

Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi Mark,
>
> This is also not a patch review yet :)
>
> On Thu 09 Jul 2009 18:11, Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I added the following macros, whose names explicitly state how %nil
>> should be handled.  See the comments in the patch for more information
>> about these.

Hi Mark,

I'm really sorry I haven't reviewed this patch yet, or commented on
your arguments for handling %nil more pervasively.  From skimming the
emails, your arguments look persuasive, but I'm afraid detailed review
will have to wait a bit longer, as I'm going to be on holiday and away
from email for a couple of weeks.  I'm sorry about that, and really
appreciate your work on this area.

Regards,
        Neil