[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible? |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:19:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi!
>
> Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> "In addition to its manual, the package should have a file named
>> @file{NEWS} which contains a list of user-visible changes worth
>> mentioning. ..."
>>
>> So I'd say that use of Gnulib (in general) should not be a NEWS item.
>> I think HACKING would be the right place to mention it - and it would
>> be just as accessible there (as in NEWS) to blurred users/developers.
>
> Sure, that's a possibility.
>
> (I think we don't disagree on what `NEWS' should contain, but on whether
> Gnulib qualifies as "user-visible".)
I would certainly agree that individual portability fixes should be in
NEWS. Is that what you have in mind?
Neil
- NEWS entries -- user-visible?, Andy Wingo, 2009/06/14
- Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?, Julian Graham, 2009/06/14
- Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?, Neil Jerram, 2009/06/14
- Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/06/18
- Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?, Neil Jerram, 2009/06/19
- Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/06/19
- Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?, Neil Jerram, 2009/06/19
- Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/06/19
- Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?, Neil Jerram, 2009/06/27
- Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/06/27
- Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?,
Neil Jerram <=
- Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/06/29
Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?, Neil Jerram, 2009/06/14
Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/06/18