[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible? |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Jun 2009 23:05:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I'm really not sure. It's an interesting idea. And I think it
>> touches on the part of GNU philosophy that tries not to draw a firm
>> line between users and developers. Do you think it's worth asking
>> people on gnu-prog-discuss?
>
> Yes, why not. Would you like to do this?
I just checked standards.texi before going ahead with this, and
actually it seems pretty clear:
"In addition to its manual, the package should have a file named
@file{NEWS} which contains a list of user-visible changes worth
mentioning. ..."
So I'd say that use of Gnulib (in general) should not be a NEWS item.
I think HACKING would be the right place to mention it - and it would
be just as accessible there (as in NEWS) to blurred users/developers.
Regards,
Neil
- NEWS entries -- user-visible?, Andy Wingo, 2009/06/14
- Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?, Julian Graham, 2009/06/14
- Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?, Neil Jerram, 2009/06/14
- Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/06/18
- Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?, Neil Jerram, 2009/06/19
- Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/06/19
- Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?, Neil Jerram, 2009/06/19
- Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/06/19
- Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?,
Neil Jerram <=
- Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/06/27
- Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?, Neil Jerram, 2009/06/29
- Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/06/29
Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?, Neil Jerram, 2009/06/14
Re: NEWS entries -- user-visible?, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/06/18