Re: srfi-18 and the vm

[Julian Graham]

I second the Yaaaay!


On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Andy Wingo <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm catching up with mail. On my syncase-in-boot-9 branch, I enabled
> compilation of srfi-18 and fixed a bug in it regarding multiple-value
> returns. Now I just ran the srfi-18 test like 100 times in a row and it
> didn't show any strange errors. Yaaaay!
>
> With psyntax running a pre-analysis phase on all source code, we can do
> away with lazy memoization entirely -- a neat hack, but it made eval.c
> buggy and impenetrable. I'll write more about that in the future.