Re: Plan for 2.0

[Neil Jerram]

2009/1/4 Neil Jerram <address@hidden>:
> 2009/1/4 David Séverin <address@hidden>:
>> Hi Guilers,
>>
>> It might be a small thing [and of course not a priority at all], but I'd 
>> love to see
>> a small evolution of the manual index structure in order to separate scheme
>> procedures from others, scheme variables from others...:
>>
>>    * Concept Index
>>    * Scheme Prodedure Index    * C Procedure Index
>>    * Scheme Variable Index             * C Variable Index
>>    * Scheme Type Index                 * C Type Index
>>    * R5RS Index
>>
>> Being a scheme 'only' programmer, I'd love not to have to scroll through
>> gh_* and scm_* ... when I am looking for something in an index.
>
> Thanks for this idea!
>
> I'm not persuaded by the procedure/variable/type separation

I'm sorry, that's complete nonsense, as we already have the
procedure/variable/type separation.

So in fact now I completely agree with what you've suggested.

Regards,
        Neil