[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:39:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:
> I did a big rewrite of the garbage collector between 1.6 and 1.8; See
>
> commit 06e80f59f976c8dda5161804f611f489ec2948a2
> Author: Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue Dec 10 13:26:25 2002 +0000
>
> and following commits.
>
> This was undoubtedly the cause for this. I hope you don't want me to
> figure what it was I did 6 years ago that caused the breakage.
Eh. ;-)
I was not implying you're guilty, just emphasizing that what triggered
the original thread was the difference in heap usage in 1.6 vs 1.8.
Ludo'.
- Re: GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE, (continued)
- Re: GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/08/18
- Re: GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/08/18
- Re: GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/08/19
- Re: GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/08/19
- Re: GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/08/19
- Re: GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/08/21
- Re: GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/08/21
- Re: GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/08/21
- Re: GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/08/22
- Re: GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/08/21
- Re: GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/08/18
- Re: GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/08/18
- Re: GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/08/18
- Re: GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/08/19
- Re: GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/08/18
- Re: GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/08/19
- Re: GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/08/19
- GOOPS memory corruption in `go_to_hell ()', Ludovic Courtès, 2008/08/19
- Re: GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/08/19
- Re: GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/08/22