Re: SRFI-88-style keywords

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi,

"Julian Graham" <address@hidden> writes:

>>  Now, we should do something about `cond-expand' and `require-extension'.
>>  For the former, we should probably look at the current value of
>>  `(read-options)', but that requires changing the implementation of
>>  `cond-expand'.  For the latter, we can provide a dummy module that
>>  modifies `read-options' and re-export the needed procedures.
>>
>>  Thoughts?
>
> Sorry, what's the context?  Is it that those functions read characters
> independent of the default reader?

We want `cond-expand' (SRFI-0) and `require-extension' (SRFI-55) to be
SRFI-88-aware if possible.  See what I mean?

Thanks,
Ludo'.