Re: SRFI-88-style keywords

[Julian Graham]

>  I think now is a good time so I just committed the attached patch.

Yay!  Thanks, Ludovic.


>  Now, we should do something about `cond-expand' and `require-extension'.
>  For the former, we should probably look at the current value of
>  `(read-options)', but that requires changing the implementation of
>  `cond-expand'.  For the latter, we can provide a dummy module that
>  modifies `read-options' and re-export the needed procedures.
>
>  Thoughts?

Sorry, what's the context?  Is it that those functions read characters
independent of the default reader?