[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The Big Switch to Git
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: The Big Switch to Git |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:14:03 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) |
Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Oh; you could import those your self, and push them to other branches in the
>> same repository. For lilypond we have the website and the binary builder
>> in
>> a branch web and gub respectively.
>
> Branches within a Git repository are supposed to be related, i.e., to
> have a fair amount of common data, otherwise using a separate repository
> is probably a better idea.
The branches are related by being part of a common project, and
therefore sharing the same set of committers. Also, it's not a
all-or-nothing thing. Using another branch is a low profile way of
getting started, because it requires no setup at all. If the need
(different committers, high activity level) is there, you can always
push the branches into a different repo
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- Re: The Big Switch to Git, (continued)
- Re: The Big Switch to Git, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/03/15
- Re: The Big Switch to Git, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/03/16
- Re: The Big Switch to Git, Neil Jerram, 2008/03/24
- Re: The Big Switch to Git, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/03/27
- Re: The Big Switch to Git, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/03/27
- Re: The Big Switch to Git, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/03/27
- Re: The Big Switch to Git, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/03/28
- Re: The Big Switch to Git, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/03/28
- Re: The Big Switch to Git, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/03/28
- Re: The Big Switch to Git, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/03/28
- Re: The Big Switch to Git,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
Re: The Big Switch to Git, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/03/15
Re: The Big Switch to Git, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/03/21
Re: The Big Switch to Git, Neil Jerram, 2008/03/24