[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The Big Switch to Git
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: The Big Switch to Git |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:07:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
() Neil Jerram <address@hidden>
() Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:16:23 +0000
> It would be nice to have workbook and guile-scripts as peers of
> guile-core, since that forms the minimal set to reproduce "cvs
> checkout hack" of yore. (Basically, the cvs-module "hack"
> included only those three cvs-modules.)
I'm not aware that this "hack" collection has been doing anything for
us recently. At least, it's true that guile-core does not currently
depend on workbook, as it did once.
It's only value would be for history browsing. Granted, that history is
shallow; interest quickly moved away from the non-guile-core cvs modules.
I'm sure there is stuff in workbook and guile-scripts that is still
useful, but I prefer to import it lazily (and as and when it becomes a
priority). That will also allow us to consider where each imported
item should go within the Git repository.
I urge you to reconsider. It's no big deal to import them and leave them be
(for historians). You can even make them read-only.
Wouldn't it make sense for guile-www to be a separate Savannah
project?
Yes. If Guile maintainers don't mind, i can pursue that angle. More
precisely, i would create a Guile-WWW project on Savannah (w/ myself its
sole administrator), make a Git repo available, shutdown the gnuvola
guile-www Git repo, and post an announcement to the guile-user list.
In case this sounds like I'm singling out guile-www, I've actually
always had a problem understanding the structure and existence of the
Guile CVS modules other than guile-core - and I think the fact that
many of them are obsolete and/or bitrotted is a clue that this is a
problem in practice.
Yes, there's a lot of hoarding of lost bits, there. However, i think
singling out Guile-WWW is fine; it has undergone continued development,
whereas the others have not.
thi
- The Big Switch to Git, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/03/14
- Re: The Big Switch to Git, Greg Troxel, 2008/03/14
- Re: The Big Switch to Git, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/03/15
- Re: The Big Switch to Git, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/03/16
- Re: The Big Switch to Git, Neil Jerram, 2008/03/24
- Re: The Big Switch to Git,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=
- Re: The Big Switch to Git, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/03/27
- Re: The Big Switch to Git, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/03/27
- Re: The Big Switch to Git, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/03/28
- Re: The Big Switch to Git, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/03/28
- Re: The Big Switch to Git, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/03/28
- Re: The Big Switch to Git, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/03/28
- Re: The Big Switch to Git, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/03/28
Re: The Big Switch to Git, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/03/15
Re: The Big Switch to Git, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/03/21