[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses
|
From: |
Klaus Schilling |
|
Subject: |
Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses |
|
Date: |
Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:41:51 +0100 (CET) |
From: Clinton Ebadi <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:38:03 -0500
> and not abort the entire system. At least in SBCL it takes a lot of
> abuse before a C library can crash anything.
That's completely illicit, as SBCL
is of no use whatsoever as an embeddable extension library.
Klaus Schilling
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Andy Wingo, 2007/12/05
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/12/09
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Andreas Rottmann, 2007/12/09
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/12/11
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Klaus Schilling, 2007/12/12
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Neil Jerram, 2007/12/12
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Clinton Ebadi, 2007/12/12
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses,
Klaus Schilling <=
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/12/13
- Re: [patch] subordinate SMOBs with GOOPS superclasses, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/12/13