Re: r6rs

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi,

Klaus Schilling <address@hidden> writes:

> Are the guile maintainers going to implement the recently ratified
> R6RS?

I have an implementation of R5.92RS bytevectors and related binary I/O
procedures [0], which I'm going to "upgrade" to R6RS.  I'm inclined to
eventually include it in Guile HEAD, if others agree.

I'm not aware of anyone planning to work on other parts of R6RS, though.
I think having R6RS modules would be nice, but there's some work to do
before we can consider working on it.

Thanks,
Ludovic.

[0] http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/software/guile/guile-r6rs-libs-0.0.tar.gz