[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Switching to Git?
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: Switching to Git? |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Aug 2007 15:28:28 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070719) |
address@hidden escreveu:
> If there must be a switch, I'd also say that subversion is probably the best
> way to go.
> Less culture shock for long time cvs users. Windows people aren't left out.
> Guile doesn't
> really need the massively distributed model that the Linux kernel requires.
Actually, try this for a data point:
git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/lilypond.git
cd lilypond; gitk
what you will see is the history of LilyPond, which is not massively distributed
by any standard. If you press page down a couple of time, you will see
'parallel'
development and merging of several topics, eg.
- Spacing features by Joe Neeman
- Release fixes by me
- translation updates by John Mandereau and helpers
- doc updates by Graham Percival and helpers
these all happen in parallel. In particular, I am the release coordinator,
and I always make releases which are effectively branches. This means that
I can make small fixes (eg. a make dist failure) to build a release locally
and merge them back into the repository HEAD later. My releases are
not inconvenienced by large hacks that are pushed to the HEAD.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- Re: Switching to Git?, (continued)
- Re: Switching to Git?, Greg Troxel, 2007/08/21
- Re: Switching to Git?, Dan McMahill, 2007/08/21
- Re: Switching to Git?, Andy Wingo, 2007/08/21
- Re: Switching to Git?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/08/25
- Re: Switching to Git?, dsmich, 2007/08/21
- Re: Switching to Git?,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=