[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: port-for-each vs lazy sweep
|
From: |
Kevin Ryde |
|
Subject: |
Re: port-for-each vs lazy sweep |
|
Date: |
Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:32:32 +1000 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
Actually I see the flush func of a soft port is entirely unused, it's
never called by a force-output because nothing is ever put in the port
buffer as such. The manual could be clearer about what it's supposed to
be for :-(.
At any rate, I put in the failing test below for port-for-each, and I
think flush-all could benefit from the rewrite below, just on general
principles.
ports.test.diff
Description: Text Data
ports.c.flush-all.diff
Description: Text Data
Re: port-for-each vs lazy sweep, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/08/25
Re: port-for-each vs lazy sweep, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/08/25
Re: port-for-each vs lazy sweep, Kevin Ryde, 2007/08/28