Re: Post-reader changes benchmarks

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi Andy,

Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:

> I have re-run my benchmarks against the released Guile 1.8.2, Guile HEAD
> before the reader changes, and Guile HEAD after the changes.

Thanks!  Good to see we're doing even slightly better than SCM.

That 1.6 is significantly faster than 1.8 is most likely due to the
`pthread_getspecific ()' calls that we do for each and every allocation
in 1.8, I think.

Thanks,
Ludovic.