[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: deprecated features
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: deprecated features |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:38:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061219) |
Bruce Korb escreveu:
> it chokes and dies on their system. I could, of course, incorporate
> the Guile library into my project, but I've determined that that is
> way, way, way over the top. If the interfaces are not stable enough
As a sidenote,
We incorporate a copy of the GUILE library in the binaries that we
ship for lilypond. People (call them 'clients' if you like) that go
out and create binaries on their own are a QA nightmare, as there is
no way to be sure that their configuration is working correctly. This
makes it a lot easier to deal with broken dependencies as well: if we
find a bug in a dependency, we fix it, and a patched version of the
dependency is included in the next lily release.
We do this for all dependencies except glibc.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- deprecated features, (continued)
- deprecated features, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/01/22
- Re: deprecated features, Kevin Ryde, 2007/01/22
- Re: deprecated features, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/01/22
- Re: deprecated features, Bruce Korb, 2007/01/23
- Re: deprecated features, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/01/23
- Re: deprecated features, Bruce Korb, 2007/01/23
- Re: deprecated features, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/01/23
- Re: deprecated features, Bruce Korb, 2007/01/23
- Re: deprecated features, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/01/23
- Re: deprecated features, Bruce Korb, 2007/01/23
- Re: deprecated features,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: deprecated features, Kevin Ryde, 2007/01/24
Re: Eval options macro: backward compatibility?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/01/22
Re: Eval options macro: backward compatibility?, Kevin Ryde, 2007/01/22
Re: Eval options macro: backward compatibility?, Kevin Ryde, 2007/01/24