Re: top-repl priority of guile module

[Kevin Ryde]

Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Absolutely, yes.  One day we should get to de-polluting the guile-user
> namespace ...

Document or hide.

> Yes, except that I think Kevin's patch using process-use-modules is
> even better, because it avoids needing the resolve-interface calls,
> and also does the call-with-deferred-observers thing, which looks
> appropriate here.

I would have used `use-modules', but it objects to not being
top-level, and as a macro you can't easily construct args for it.
(One of the greatest downsides to all macros.)