[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Text collation
From: |
Rob Browning |
Subject: |
Re: Text collation |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:55:49 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
>>> Personally, I would like Guile "core" to be much more modular than
>>> what it is now.
>
> Me too. And I think this should mean separate libraries.
>
>> I don't really disagree. In particular, I think this is something we
>> should definitely consider as we examine R6RS.
>
> Ah yes, R6RS. I've been following r6rs-discuss just enough to feel
> worried about this! (My impression is that there's quite a lot of
> change from R5RS, not just additions.)
Although I still haven't looked at R6RS carefully yet, I've been
wondering if this might be an opportunity to think about a Guile 2.0
release, one where we give ourselves more latitude to make disruptive
changes, perhaps including R6RS support, the addition of any other
major features, and any appropriate reorganizations (ice-9?).
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
- Re: Text collation, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/10/22
- Re: Text collation, Rob Browning, 2006/10/22
- Re: Text collation, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/10/23
- Re: Text collation, Rob Browning, 2006/10/24
- Re: Text collation, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/10/25
- Re: Text collation, Rob Browning, 2006/10/25
- Re: Text collation, Neil Jerram, 2006/10/25
- Re: Text collation,
Rob Browning <=
- Re: Text collation, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/10/26
- Re: Text collation, Neil Jerram, 2006/10/25
- Re: Text collation, Rob Browning, 2006/10/25
Re: Text collation, Neil Jerram, 2006/10/25