[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile-1.8.1 - problems on AMD64
From: |
Stanislav Ievlev |
Subject: |
Re: guile-1.8.1 - problems on AMD64 |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:26:17 +0400 |
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 02:58:58PM +0200, Ludovic Court?s wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Stanislav Ievlev <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 10:23:31AM +0200, Ludovic Court?s wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Stanislav Ievlev <address@hidden> writes:
> >>
> >> > <unnamed port>: In expression (vector-length syntmp-x-1008):
> >> > <unnamed port>: Stack overflow
> >>
> >> Did you compile with `-O0'? If so, make sure you compile at least with
> >> `-O1'.
> > You have problems with optimization disabled?
>
> Personally, no. ;-) But Guile eats up a lot of stack space when
> compiled with `-O0', to the point that you can't get to the REPL (with
> the default stack limit), hence my suggestion to use `-O1'.
>
> > However, guile does not build with glibc >=2.4 when -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 is
> > added to CFLAGS:
>
> I was unaware of that flag. Is it documented somewhere?
As I understand, this is one of security features from RedHat gcc branch.
http://www.redhat.com/magazine/006apr05/features/security/
- guile-1.8.1 - problems on AMD64, Stanislav Ievlev, 2006/10/10
- Re: guile-1.8.1 - problems on AMD64, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/10/10
- Re: guile-1.8.1 - problems on AMD64, Stanislav Ievlev, 2006/10/11
- Re: guile-1.8.1 - problems on AMD64, Kevin Ryde, 2006/10/11
- Re: guile-1.8.1 - problems on AMD64, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/10/12
- Re: guile-1.8.1 - problems on AMD64,
Stanislav Ievlev <=
- Re: guile-1.8.1 - problems on AMD64, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/10/13
- Re: guile-1.8.1 - problems on AMD64, Neil Jerram, 2006/10/14
- Re: guile-1.8.1 - problems on AMD64, Stanislav Ievlev, 2006/10/16
- Re: guile-1.8.1 - problems on AMD64, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/10/16
- Re: guile-1.8.1 - problems on AMD64, Neil Jerram, 2006/10/19
- Re: guile-1.8.1 - problems on AMD64, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/10/21