Re: Plan for guile-debugging integration

[Neil Jerram]

address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> 1. Scheme code
>>
>> By default I'd add these under (ice-9) - but perhaps we should
>> consider something else?  Please let me know if you have ideas.
>
> Maybe you could create a sub-directory, like `(ice-9 debugging)'?

Yes, good idea; I'll do that.

>> I should also say that I plan to document my Guile/Emacs interface as
>> the "official" or recommended one.  If you are concerned about that,
>> please let me know asap.
>
> No, but we need to make sure it does not lack too many features compared
> with the implementation-neutral `scheme-mode' that comes with Emacs, and

No problem there, because my mode builds on top of scheme-mode.

> perhaps also compared to `quack.el'.

I haven't looked at quack for a while, but I will do so again soon.

> Overall, your plan looks very good to me.  And I'm sure users will all
> find it very pleasant.  :-)

I hope so.  Thanks for your comments!

Regards,
     Neil