Re: srfi-9 record type checking

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi,

Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:

> I vote for just fixing record-accessor to be strict by default;
> i.e. treating current behaviour as a bug.  I'd be surprised if anyone
> was relying on this, and if they are it's easy to code a workaround.

The issue is that this would impact people that use records directly
(i.e., not via SRFI-9) and although this `#f' behavior is undocumented,
they may well have come to rely on it.

Thanks,
Ludovic.