[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ptob object scm_t_bits vs long
|
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
|
Subject: |
Re: ptob object scm_t_bits vs long |
|
Date: |
Mon, 29 May 2006 23:00:10 +0300 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Kevin Ryde <address@hidden> writes:
> scm_make_port_type returns scm_t_bits, but the various setting
> functions like scm_set_port_mark take a long. Should they be
> scm_t_bits too?
Yes. Good catch.
If you are motivated, you might think about cleaning up and
documenting the ports API... but on the other hand, that should maybe
wait until we have Unicode support sorted out.
--
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405
- Re: ptob object scm_t_bits vs long,
Marius Vollmer <=