[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Default stack limit
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: Default stack limit |
Date: |
Wed, 10 May 2006 16:31:04 +0200 |
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 01:31 +0300, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Speaking of which, a -g compile on PPC uses quite a lot of stack -- I
> > had to up the default limit in order to get anything to work (for
> > example, compiling psyntax). That would be another issue though...
>
> Yeah, it's a "known issue" also on x86. The default stack limit is a
> bit tight for a "-O0" build. I guess we should just double it or
> something. Or should we make the default 'unlimited'?
I think that 50000 words (200KB/400KB) should be more than enough for
anyone.
Haha. (Right now it is 20000 words.) Seriously, we should look into why
this is the case, has SCM had similar issues with newer GCC, etc. Is it
just the compilers that changed, or was it frames, or ...
Regards,
--
Andy Wingo
http://wingolog.org/
- Re: guile 1.8 and x86_64, Miroslav Lichvar, 2006/05/05
- Re: guile 1.8 and x86_64, Miroslav Lichvar, 2006/05/06
- Re: guile 1.8 and x86_64, Marius Vollmer, 2006/05/07
- Re: guile 1.8 and x86_64, Andy Wingo, 2006/05/08
- Re: guile 1.8 and x86_64, Marius Vollmer, 2006/05/08
- Re: guile 1.8 and x86_64, Neil Jerram, 2006/05/09
- Re: guile 1.8 and x86_64, Andy Wingo, 2006/05/09
- Default stack limit, Marius Vollmer, 2006/05/09
- Re: Default stack limit,
Andy Wingo <=
- Re: Default stack limit, Kevin Ryde, 2006/05/10