Re: SCM_DEFER_INTS in 1.6

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi,

Kevin Ryde <address@hidden> writes:

> I'm wondering if the right thing would be just to drop the
> SCM_DEFER_INTS from the guile-gtk generated code.  (The code there may
> still want a mutex then, but that's a gtk/gdk matter, unrelated to
> what guile might or might not need.)

I think what you see gets generated by G-Wrap.  Whatever
`SCM_DEFER_INTS' actually does, I can't see any reason why G-Wrap should
issue it as it does, and I've been tempted to remove it from there.  I
don't think it even needs to be replaced by a mutex or some such.  So I
think we should just happily remove it (from G-Wrap-generated code) and
see what happens!  ;-)

Thanks,
Ludovic.